• HOME

  • Bones of Burgos

  • FORUM

  • FRENCH REVOLUTION

    • Origins
    • Events
    • French Revolutionary Wars
    • The Revolution Abroad
    • The Glorious First of June
    • The Battle of Cape St Vincent
    • Occupied Europe
    • Napoleon's Early Life
    • 1793: The Siege of Toulon
    • 1796-7: Napoleon in Italy
    • 1798: Egypt Campagin
    • The War of the Second Coalition
    • The Battle of the Nile
    • Napoleon's Coup
    • War in the West Indies 1793-1801
  • NAPOLEONIC WARS

    • British Politics, 1793-1815
    • Invasion Scares in Britain, 1793-1815
    • The Peace of Amiens, 1802
    • The Redeclaration of War, 1803
    • 1805: The Battle of Trafalgar
    • 1805: Austerlitz
    • 1806: Jena-Auerstedt
    • 1807: Friedland
    • 1809: The Walcheren Expedition
    • 1809: Wagram
    • 1812: Napoleon's Invasion of Russia
    • 1813: Leipzig
    • 1815: Waterloo
    • Expanding Britain's Empire
    • Death, Glory and Legacy
  • PENINSULAR WAR

    • 1808: The War Begins
    • 1809-10: Weathering the Storm
    • 1811: Stalemate
    • 1812: Breaking the Deadlock
    • 1813: Breakout
    • 1814: The Endgame
    • Wellington's Letters
  • LEARN MORE

    • Reviews
    • TEACHER'S ZONE
    • ABOUT
    • CHANNEL
  • Members

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    To see this working, head to your live site.
    • Categories
    • All Posts
    • My Posts
    Rob Griffith
    Mar 28, 2020

    Styles of command: Wellington & Hill

    in General Discussions

    In October 1814 Wellington wrote to Lord Bathurst, Secretary for War, offering his opinion of who could take over from Sir George Prevost as C-in-C in America. Of Sir Rowland Hill he said:

    “Hill is an excellent fellow; but I should say that he wants a commander. He likes his troops in order, but he is too good natured to exert himself about it, and he would require some assistance in that way. He has talents and God knows experience enough for any situation, and he might command in chief as well as anybody else; but I should be inclined to doubt it; and to have him fail as well as out troops would be terrible.”

    This seems quite damming of one of his most trusted subordinates, who operated fairly independently for many years in the Peninsula. Their styles of command were very different with Wellington being infamous as a micro-manager, whereas Hill had a softer style and was happy to delegate. Hill's Assistant Adjutant General Lt.Col. Charles Rooke wrote of Hill: "He likes to see everything well done, but at the same time makes no fuss, and places the utmost confidence in those under him." Hill is well know as Daddy Hill, taking care of his men, but at the same time was quite willing to drive them hard and take calculated risks.

    In my professional life I've come across alpha-male, hands-on managers who see any other form of management as weakness. Is there a bit of this in Wellington's assessment of Hill? Or to succeed as a general in this period did you have to be more of a Wellington than a Hill?

    7 comments
    7 Comments

    Share Your ThoughtsSign up to leave a comment.

    R
    Rod Schwager
    Apr 04, 2020

    @Geraint Thatcher; yes.

    Like

    G
    Geraint Thatcher
    Mar 30, 2020

    Didn't Drummond take over from Prevost ?

    Like
    Rob Griffith
    Mar 30, 2020
    Replying to

    Quite possibly, Wellington was giving his opinion of several candidates.

    Like

    R
    Rory Muir
    Mar 29, 2020

    It's a good point, and we can never really know as Hill was never put to the test, but it is clear that Wellington relied on Hill as a semi-independent commander and that Hill never let him down. Still, that is not the same as bearing the whole responsibility of commanding in a theatre, and that his difficulties may have been less in keeping his men in order than in dealing with formulating strategy and dealing with civilian authorities in a framework he had to create. It is noteworthy that Wellington always insisted that if he was incapacitated the best man to replace him was Beresford - who did have experience in these fields - despite his less than impressive battlefield record. (Not saying that that was a good call, but does show the weight Wellington gave to aspects of command other than fighting).

    Like
    tomholmberg
    Apr 02, 2020
    Replying to

    There's a new book Wellington's Command by G E Jaycock which gives a good idea of how W had little good to say about anybody but W.

    Like

    Rob Griffith
    Apr 02, 2020
    Replying to

    @tomholmberg Thanks. The reviews of it aren't that positive though.

    Like

    tomholmberg
    Apr 03, 2020
    Replying to

    @Rob Griffith Amazon reviews seem mainly positive, a r even the complaint he are pretty fair and not damning. But then i never cared for the Teflon Duke.


    Like
    7 comments
    Similar Posts
    • Wellington at Verona
    • Wellington's Infantry
    • Wellington's Best Commanders
    tomholmberg
    10시간

    The Curse of the Marquis de Sade

    0
    0
    vonlettow
    Jul 08

    Final Images

    11
    1
    tomholmberg
    3일 전

    COALITIONS AGAINST NAPOLEON

    2
    0
    Hans - Karl Weiß
    Jul 30

    Davout: The Iron Marshal

    4
    0
    vonlettow
    7일 전

    Napoleon on Campaign: Classic Images of Napoleon at War

    4
    0
    Jonathan North
    5일 전

    With Murat at Pizzo in 1815

    1
    1
    Hans - Karl Weiß
    May 21

    The Most Irritating Myth of the Napoleonic Era

    5
    0
    Jonathan North
    Jul 25

    Royalistes Contre L'armée (after Waterloo)

    2
    0
    Jonathan North
    Jul 26

    Loyalty in 1815

    3
    1
    Stephen Prentice
    Jun 28

    Anatomy of Glory - going cheap

    3
    2
    Jonathan North
    Jul 22

    British in Provence, 1815

    5
    0
    Hans - Karl Weiß
    Jul 17

    The Greatest Musician of the Napoleonic Era

    3
    0
    ian.chard
    Jul 13

    Portuguese regimental colours

    4
    0
    tomholmberg
    Jul 15

    Lion Monument

    1
    0
    tomholmberg
    Jul 14

    Disabled Veterans of the Napoleonic Wars

    0
    0
    vonlettow
    Mar 02

    Questionable Images?

    63
    2
    tomholmberg
    Jul 11

    Foreign Jack Tars

    0
    0
    Peter O'Brien
    Jun 20, 2021

    Wurttemberg standards 1809-14

    7
    1
    tomholmberg
    Jul 07

    Review: Britain’s Failed Defense of the Netherlands

    1
    0
    tomholmberg
    Jul 06

    Peter Stewart Ney, Again