Inniskilling Regiment at Waterloo

"I felt weary and worn out, less from fatigue than anxiety. Our division, which had stood upwards of 5,000 men at the commencement of the battle, had gradually dwindled down into a solitary line of skirmishers. The 27th Regiment were literally lying dead, in square, a few yards behind us. My horse had received another shot through the leg, and one through the flap of the saddle, which lodged in his body, sending him a step beyond the pension list. The smoke still hung so thick about us that we could see nothing. I walked a little way to each flank, to endeavor to get a glimpse of what was going on; but nothing met my eye, except the mangled remains of men and horses, and I was obliged to return to my post as wise as I went...I had never heard of a battle in which everybody was killed; but this seemed to be an exception, as all were going by turns."-Captain John Kincaid, 95th Rifles.

The reported casualties for the 1st Bn, 27th Foot, as listed in Scott Bowden's Armies at Waterloo, were:

Present for Duty:

Officers: 21.

Enlisted: 731.

Killed:

Officers: 2.

Enlisted: 103.

Wounded:

Officers: 14.

Enlisted: 360.

479 out of 752 present were killed or wounded.

Both the article and @Kevin F. Kiley 's reply has the same difficulty. Besides Lt Drewe's two brief letters in Siborne, there are no available accounts from within the battalion itself, only external observers such as Kincaid and Ross-Llewyn etc.

Despite 11 volumes of @Gareth Glover 's excellent Waterloo Archive and Dan Harvey's 'A Bloody Day, The Irish at Waterloo' (H Books Cork 2015) there are no more 27th sources to be found, hardly surprising though when you consider the 66% casualty rate. Officers, who provide the majority of exyewitness accounts particularly so, out of 19 by the end of the day 2 were dead and 14 wounded.