I have to say that I'm surprised that this article is taken at all seriously. It reads to me like nationalistic myth-making rather than considered historical research - broad brush statements without supporting evidence. Britain can rightfully be accused of many underhand dealings throughout history, and I clearly don't know if there was any involvement in Paul's murder, but to portray the state of Russia as the weaker, put-upon party, strikes me to be nothing more than nationalist propoganda.
This is not meant to diminish the huge part that Russia played in the defeat of Napoleon's dreams of domination, but a little more impartial analysis of the events of that time would make this article rather more plausible.
I agree a poorly researched article - so a snuff box?
Did anybody read
The best sources concerning the final phase of the conspiracy are T. Schiemann, “Des Generals Grafen von Bennigsen Brief an den General von Fock über die Emordung Kaiser Pauls, ” Historischc Vierteljahrschajt (1901), pp. 57-69
or his book about the murder? No - well it explains a lot about how one is able to lance conspiration theories.
Of course our anglo saxon friend doesn't master the German language - Ermordung and Historische Vierteljahrschrift ( so did he read it?)
Lord Whitworth and the Conspiracy Against Tsar Paul I: The New Evidence of the Kent ArchiveJames J. Kenney, Jr.
Like
Following an obligatory upgrade of the forum imposed by the developers who maintain the website's programming (Wix.com), the forum has now been moved onto a new system called 'Groups'. Members should still be able to post as usual, by clicking the 'New Forum' tab at the top of the screen. We apologise for the inconvenience. Welcome to the future.
I have to say that I'm surprised that this article is taken at all seriously. It reads to me like nationalistic myth-making rather than considered historical research - broad brush statements without supporting evidence. Britain can rightfully be accused of many underhand dealings throughout history, and I clearly don't know if there was any involvement in Paul's murder, but to portray the state of Russia as the weaker, put-upon party, strikes me to be nothing more than nationalist propoganda.
This is not meant to diminish the huge part that Russia played in the defeat of Napoleon's dreams of domination, but a little more impartial analysis of the events of that time would make this article rather more plausible.